Paris Agreement Ratchet Mechanism

The UN climate agreement, signed in Paris last year, is expected to improve over time. It seems that the ratchet mechanism is not a mechanism, but rather a vast collection of pieces of text. Previously, many negotiators and observers believed that climate change cooperation was based on two false complementary premises: that negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) were the main causal factor in global emissions developments; and that climate protection was a game that had to be “resolved” once and for all by prior agreement. As a result, many saw the necessary “solution” as a comprehensive treaty that would set binding commitments for countries to reduce emissions, which together would complement a sufficient global effort to combat climate change. Whatever they sign, it will probably take some interpretation at the end of the negotiations, Louisa Casson, a political advisor at the London think tank E3G, told Carbon Brief. This legal mechanism must be transformed into a signal that will be translated into the language of the real world. It says the text currently proposes a “facilitation dialogue” either in 2018 or 2019. This would not be part of the binding process launched by the Paris Agreement, which will not come into force until 2020, but it could play a “test” role, Jaco of WWF`s Roof tells Carbon Brief. Current climate policy will not meet the agreement`s objectives of keeping global temperature rise “well below” 2 degrees Celsius and achieving zero net emissions in the second half of the century. As you can imagine, the climate change goals that governments are familiar with are generally not ambitious enough. By the end of 2019, not only are the vast majority of countries not on track to meet the climate limits set by the Paris Agreement, but they are not even on track to achieve their already inadequate CNN.

According to data published in September 2019 by the Climate Action Tracker research group, the current national policy predicts that the world will exceed warming by 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2035 and reach 3.2 degrees Celsius of warming by the end of the century. The Paris Agreement is unlikely to improve this business as usual scenario: among the NDC`s current targets, warming is expected to reach 2.9 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. Despite this poor performance, the Paris agreement is not useless. It`s far, much better than nothing – and if climate activists are smart, we can use its mechanisms to our advantage. 2020 gives us the perfect opportunity to do so.

Comments are closed.